Citation

Cox J, Meaux LT, Stanziani M, Coffey CA, Daquin J. J. Interpers. Violence 2019; ePub(ePub): 886260519849689.

Affiliation

The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0886260519849689

PMID

31130029

Abstract

In the United States, prosecutors are typically allotted a large amount of discretion when litigating a criminal case. Although some level of discretion is necessary for various reasons (e.g., lack of resources), concerns have arisen in both scholarly and popular discourse that prosecutorial discretion remains generally unchecked. Furthermore, research suggests prosecutors may be influenced by extralegal factors when making decisions about how to proceed with criminal charges. In this study, prosecutors responded to a case of alleged intimate partner violence, in which the sex and sexual orientation of the defendant and victim were manipulated. Neither sex nor sexual orientation impacted prosecutor choice to proceed with charges, the severity of the charge selected, or the harshness of the plea bargain offered. However, prosecutors were more willing to proceed without the victim's cooperation when the victim was female and perceived heterosexual males as more aggressive than heterosexual females. These data suggest prosecutorial decision making in cases of intimate partner violence may not be unduly influenced by defendant/victim sex and sexual orientation.

Language: en

Keywords

GLBT; domestic violence; perceptions of domestic violence