SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Yu C, Sun W, Liu HX, Yang X. Transp. Res. B Methodol. 2019; 122: 416-435.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.trb.2019.03.002

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Reservation-based methods with simple policies such as first-come-first-service (FCFS) have been proposed in the literature to manage connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) at isolated intersections. However, a comprehensive analysis of intersection capacity and vehicle delay under FCFS-based control is missing, especially under high traffic demand. To address this problem, this study adopts queueing theory and analytically shows that such method is incapable of handling high demand with multiple conflicting traffic streams. Furthermore, an optimization model is proposed to optimally serve CAVs arriving at an intersection for delay minimization. This study then compares the performance of the proposed optimization-based control with reservation-based control as well as conventional vehicle-actuated control at different demand levels. Simulation results show that the proposed optimization-based control performs best and it has noticeable advantages over the other two control methods. The advantages of reservation-based control are insignificant compared with vehicle-actuated control under high demand.


Language: en

Keywords

Connected and automated vehicle; Isolated intersection; Optimization; Reservation

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print