Citation

Chrisinger BW, King AC, Hua J, Saelens BE, Frank LD, Conway TL, Cain KL, Sallis JF. Geriatrics (Basel) 2019; 4(1): e4010011.

Affiliation

Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of California, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. jsallis@ucsd.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, MDPI: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute)

DOI

10.3390/geriatrics4010011

PMID

31023979

Abstract

(1) Background: Findings from observational studies of relations between neighborhood environments and health outcomes underscore the importance of both objective and perceived experiences of those environments. A clearer understanding of the factors associated with discrepancies between these two assessment approaches is needed to tailor public health interventions to specific populations. This study examined how individual and neighborhood characteristics affect perceptions of supermarket distance, particularly when perceptions do not match objective measures. (2) Methods: Participants were older adults (n = 880) participating in the Senior Neighborhood Quality of Life Study in the Seattle/King County, WA or Baltimore/Washington, DC regions. Two main analyses were conducted. The primary outcome for Analysis I was participants' geographic information systems (GIS)-based objective network distance to the closest supermarket. Generalized linear mixed models with block group-level random effects were used to assess associations between objective supermarket distance and individual/neighborhood characteristics. The primary outcome for Analysis II was a categorical "accuracy" variable, based on participants' perceived distance to the nearest supermarket/grocery store relative to the objective distance, assuming a walking speed of 1.0 m/s. Multivariate log-linear models fit neural networks were used to assess influential covariates. (3) Results: Several significant associations with objective distance to the nearest supermarket were observed, including a negative relationship with body mass index (BMI) (95% CI = -45.56, -0.23), having walked to the supermarket in the last 30 days (-174.86, -59.42), living in a high-walkability neighborhood, and residing in Seattle/King County (-707.69, -353.22). In terms of participants' distance accuracy, 29% were classified as accurate, 33.9% were "Underestimators", 24.0% "Overestimators", and 13.2% responded "Don't Know". Compared to Accurate participants, Overestimators were significantly less likely to have walked to the supermarket in the last 30 days, and lived objectively closer to a supermarket; Underestimators perceived significantly higher pedestrian safety and lived objectively further from a supermarket; and Don't Know were more likely to be women, older, not living independently, and not having recently walked to the supermarket. (4) Conclusions: Both modifiable and nonmodifiable factors influence the accuracy of older adults' perceptions of their proximity to the nearest supermarket. Recent experience in walking to the closest supermarket, along with personal safety, represent potentially modifiable perceived environmental factors that were related to older adults' accuracy of perceptions of their neighborhood food environment.

Language: en

Keywords

GIS; built environment; food access; food environment; neighborhood environment walkability scale; older adults; perception; walkability