SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Stokes CM, Alonso J, Andrade LH, Atwoli L, Cardoso G, Chiu WT, Dinolova RV, Gureje O, Karam AN, Karam EG, Kessler RC, Chatterji S, King A, Lee S, Mneimneh Z, Oladeji BD, Petukhova M, Rapsey C, Sampson NA, Scott K, Street A, Viana MC, Williams MA, Bossarte RM. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2019; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, 364 Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA. rbossarte@hsc.wvu.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s00127-019-01703-z

PMID

30993376

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a pervasive public health problem. Existing research has focused on reports from victims and few studies have considered pre-marital factors. The main objective of this study was to identify pre-marital predictors of IPV in the current marriage using information obtained from husbands and wives.

METHODS: Data from were obtained from married heterosexual couples in six countries. Potential predictors included demographic and relationship characteristics, adverse childhood experiences, dating violence, and psychiatric disorders. Reports of IPV and other characteristics from husbands and wives were considered independently and in relation to spousal reports.

RESULTS: Overall, 14.4% of women were victims of IPV in the current marriage. Analyses identified ten significant variables including age at first marriage (husband), education, relative number of previous marriages (wife), history of one or more categories of childhood adversity (husband or wife), history of dating violence (husband or wife), early initiation of sexual intercourse (husband or wife), and four combinations of internalizing and externalizing disorders. The final model was moderately predictive of marital violence, with the 5% of women accounting for 18.6% of all cases of marital IPV.

CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study advance understanding of pre-marital predictors of IPV within current marriages, including the importance of considering differences in the experiences of partners prior to marriage and may provide a foundation for more targeted primary prevention efforts.


Language: en

Keywords

Epidemiology; International; Intimate partner violence; Mental health; Predictive modeling

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print