SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Sioud R, Khalifa R, Houel N. Gait Posture 2019; 70: 175-178.

Affiliation

ESO-Paris Recherche, Ecole Supérieure d'Ostéopathie - Paris, 8 rue Alfred Nobel, 77420 Champs Sur Marne, France; Laboratoire Performance, Santé, Métrologie, Société - EA 7507, UFRSTAPS - Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Campus Moulin de la Housse, 51100 Reims, France. Electronic address: Nicolas.houel@eso-suposteo.fr.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.03.004

PMID

30878728

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Congenitally blind subjects developed postural adaptations improving somatosensory and vestibular systems to maintain upright stability and auditory skills to orient them in environment. However, the influence of auditory cues on upright stability in congenitally blind subjects stays unknown. RESEARCH QUESTION: The aim of this study is to define the influence of an auditory cue in congenitally blind subjects back space on their balance posture.

METHODS: Eleven sighted subjects and eleven congenitally blind subjects performed upright bipedal and unipedal quiet stances on a force plate with two conditions of auditory cue played by a loudspeaker placed 2 m behind them. Mean CoP velocity were recorded. Student test was used to compare significant difference between blind and sighted subjects bipedal and unipedal postures stability in both conditions of auditory cue.

RESULTS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Results showed that congenitally blind subjects had no significant difference in mean sway velocity compared to sighted subjects in bipedal upright posture in auditory signal condition. However, blind subjects had significant lower mean sway velocity than sighted subjects in bipedal upright posture without sound. Blind subjects had significant increased mean sway velocity during unipedal quiet standing in both auditory cue conditions (with and without sound). The results showed that congenitally blind subjects used auditory cues placed behind them in order to improve their balance control in bipedal upright posture. In this case, blind subjects could better use compensatory mechanisms to perform quiet standing as sighted subjects. Without sound or in unipedal upright posture, congenitally blind subjects probably have sensory perturbations or limitations that impose them adaptations in order to avoid falling risk. Auditory cues should be study in the aim to better understand the compensatory mechanisms used by congenitally blind subjects to perform postural balance in usual environment.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Auditory signal; Balance control; Bipedal; Congenital blindness; Unipedal

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print