Citation

Macy RJ, Nurius PS, Norris J. J. Interpers. Violence 2007; 22(5): 520-542.

Affiliation

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. rjmacy@email.unc.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0886260506298839

PMID

17429021

Abstract

Little guidance exists about how to tailor empowerment and resistance sexual assault programming to be responsive to varying groups of women. Using an investigation of 415 college women who completed a self-administered survey about a range of sexually aggressive experiences by a known male assailant, this investigation tested for distinct multivariate profiles of contextual factors among sexually assaulted women to discern how these factors may differentially combine to influence women's vulnerability to sexual assault. We applied latent profile analysis (LPA) to determine meaningful subgroups of women based on interrelationships among factors that contextualize women's vulnerability to sexual assault, including prior victimization, alcohol consumption, relationship expectancies of the assailant, and assertive precautionary habits. LPA established four significantly distinct multivariate profiles of substantively different groups of women. Group difference tests reinforced the findings and aided in group profile interpretations. Implications for the development of tailored resistance and empowerment programs are discussed.

Language: en