SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Antoniou T, Ala-Leppilampi K, Shearer D, Parsons JA, Tadrous M, Gomes T. Int. J. Drug Policy 2019; 66: 15-22.

Affiliation

Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Canada; The Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; The Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Canada; The Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: GomesT@smh.ca.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.015

PMID

30685650

Abstract

AIMS: To characterize the impacts of policies intended to improve opioid prescribing and prevent opioid-related overdose and death on individuals who take opioids.

METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using focus groups with 48 adults aged 18 years and over who had experience taking opioids. Participants were recruited from across Ontario, Canada, and separate focus groups were held for individuals taking opioids for chronic pain and individuals taking opioids for other reasons. We drew upon stigma theory to interpret participants' accounts.

RESULTS: Following analysis and interpretation, we generated three themes describing the impacts of recently implemented opioid-related policies and harm reduction interventions on people who take opioids: 'propagating stigma: addict as dominant status', 'loss of autonomy' and 'producing/reproducing structural vulnerabilities'. Specifically, participants characterize an environment in which 'addict' has become the dominant social identity ascribed to people who take opioids, and where relationships with providers have become strained as participants perceive themselves to be powerless when decisions regarding opioid use and pain management are made. These shifts in identity and relationships had negative repercussions when help-seeking and exposed larger vulnerabilities related to poverty and criminalization.

CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of opioid-related policies had unintended consequences for people who take opioids. Potential measures for mitigating these consequences include ensuring that people who take opioids are involved in all facets of policy development and implementation, integrating peer workers into the care of these individuals, and respecting patient agency when decisions about pain management and opioid use are made.

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.


Language: en

Keywords

Health policy; Opioid prescribing; Qualitative research

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print