CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Marcoci A, Burgman M, Kruger A, Silver E, McBride M, Thorn FS, Fraser H, Wintle BC, Fidler F, Vercammen A. Front. Psychol. 2018; 9: 2634. |
|
Affiliation |
School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2018, Frontiers Research Foundation) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
30666222 |
|
PMCID |
|
|
Abstract |
Background: The events of 9/11 and the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq's Continuing Programs for Weapons of Mass Destruction precipitated fundamental changes within the United States Intelligence Community. As part of the reform, analytic tradecraft standards were revised and codified into a policy document - Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 203 - and an analytic ombudsman was appointed in the newly created Office for the Director of National Intelligence to ensure compliance across the intelligence community. In this paper we investigate the untested assumption that the ICD203 criteria can facilitate reliable evaluations of analytic products. Methods: Fifteen independent raters used a rubric based on the ICD203 criteria to assess the quality of reasoning of 64 analytical reports generated in response to hypothetical intelligence problems. We calculated the intra-class correlation coefficients for single and group-aggregated assessments. Results: Despite general training and rater calibration, the reliability of individual assessments was poor. However, aggregate ratings showed good to excellent reliability. Conclusion: Given that real problems will be more difficult and complex than our hypothetical case studies, we advise that groups of at least three raters are required to obtain reliable quality control procedures for intelligence products. Our study sets limits on assessment reliability and provides a basis for further evaluation of the predictive validity of intelligence reports generated in compliance with the tradecraft standards. Language: en |
|
Keywords |
ICD203; IRTPA; ODNI; intelligence analysis; intelligence failures; intelligence reform; inter-rater reliability; tradecraft standards |