Citation

Wolkin AF, Schnall AH, Nakata NK, Ellis EM. Prehosp. Disaster Med. 2018; ePub(ePub): 1-6.

Affiliation

United States Virgin Islands Department of Health,Saint Thomas,Virgin Islands,USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Cambridge University Press)

DOI

10.1017/S1049023X1800119X

PMID

30585143

Abstract

Effective communication is a critical part of managing an emergency. During an emergency, the ways in which health agencies normally communicate warnings may not reach all of the intended audience. Not all communities are the same, and households within communities are diverse. Because different communities prefer different communication methods, community leaders and emergency planners need to know their communities' preferred methods for seeking information about an emergency. This descriptive report explores findings from previous community assessments that have collected information on communication preferences, including television (TV), social media, and word-of-mouth (WoM) delivery methods. Data were analyzed from 12 Community Assessments for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPERs) conducted from 2014-2017 that included questions regarding primary and trusted communication sources. A CASPER is a rapid needs assessment designed to gather household-based information from a community. In 75.0% of the CASPERs, households reported TV as their primary source of information for specific emergency events (range = 24.0%-83.1%). Households reporting social media as their primary source of information differed widely across CASPERs (3.2%-41.8%). In five of the CASPERs, nearly one-half of households reported WoM as their primary source of information. These CASPERs were conducted in response to a specific emergency (ie, chemical spill, harmful algal bloom, hurricane, and flood). The CASPERs conducted as part of a preparedness activity had lower percentages of households reporting WoM as their primary source of information (8.3%-10.4%). The findings in this report demonstrate the need for emergency plans to include hybrid communication models, combining traditional methods with newer technologies to reach the broadest audience. Although TV was the most commonly reported preferred source of information, segments of the population relied on social media and WoM messaging. By using multiple methods for risk communication, emergency planners are more likely to reach the whole community and engage vulnerable populations that might not have access to, trust in, or understanding of traditional news sources. Multiple communication channels that include user-generated content, such as social media and WoM, can increase the timeliness of messaging and provide community members with message confirmation from sources they trust encouraging them to take protective public health actions.Wolkin AF, Schnall AH, Nakata NK, Ellis EM. Getting the message out: social media and word-of-mouth as effective communication methods during emergencies.

Language: en

Keywords

AARP American Association of Retired Persons; CASPER Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response; CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency; NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s; WoM word-of-mouth; disaster preparedness; emergency response; risk communication