Citation

Timpson M, Hade EM, Beaulieu C, Horn SD, Hammond FM, Peng J, Montgomery E, Giuffrida C, Gilchrist K, Lash A, Dijkers M, Corrigan JD, Bogner J. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2018; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: bogner.1@osu.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.015

PMID

30578774

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use causal inference methods to determine if receipt of a greater proportion inpatient rehabilitation treatment focused on higher level functions, e.g. executive functions, ambulating over uneven surfaces (Advanced Therapy, AdvTx) results in better rehabilitation outcomes.

DESIGN: A cohort study using propensity score methods applied to the TBI-Practice-Based Evidence (TBI-PBE) database, a database consisting of multi-site, prospective, longitudinal observational data. SETTING: Acute inpatient rehabilitation (IRF). PARTICIPANTS: Patients enrolled in the TBI-PBE study (n=1843), aged 14 years or older, who sustained a severe, moderate, or complicated mild TBI, receiving their first IRF admission to one of 9 sites in the US, and consented to follow-up 3 and 9 months post discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective-17, FIMTM Motor and Cognitive scores, Satisfaction with Life Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9.

RESULTS: Controlling for measured potential confounders, increasing the percentage of AdvTx during inpatient TBI rehabilitation was found to be associated with better community participation, functional independence, life satisfaction, and decreased likelihood of depression during the year following discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Participants who began rehabilitation with greater disability experienced larger gains on some outcomes than those who began rehabilitation with more intact abilities.

CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the proportion of treatment targeting higher level functions appears to have no detrimental and a small, beneficial effect on outcome. Caution should be exercised when inferring causality given that a large number of potential confounders could not be completely controlled with propensity score methods. Further, the extent to which unmeasured confounders influenced the findings is not known and could be of particular concern due to the potential for the patient's recovery trajectory to influence therapists' decisions to provide a greater amount AdvTx.

Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Language: en

Keywords

Brain injuries; Occupational therapy; Outcome assessment (health care); Physical therapy; Propensity score; Recreation therapy; Rehabilitation; Speech therapy; traumatic