Citation

Powell KG, Treitler P, Peterson NA, Borys S, Hallcom D. Int. J. Drug Policy 2019; 64: 21-29.

Affiliation

NJ Division of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Office of Planning, Research, Evaluation and Prevention, 222 South Warren Street, Trenton, NJ 08625-0700, United States. Electronic address: Donald.Hallcom@doh.state.nj.us.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.12.004

PMID

30551002

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fatal opioid overdose is a national public health concern in the United States and a critical problem confronting New Jersey's addiction treatment system. New Jersey developed an innovative program, the Opioid Overdose Recovery Program (OORP), to address the epidemic and the issue of low treatment admissions following a non-fatal overdose. The OORP utilizes an intervention model with peer recovery specialists (RSs) and patient navigators (PNs) to engage individuals within emergency departments (EDs) immediately following an opioid overdose reversal. The purpose of this exploratory s/tudy was to examine the process through which the OORP was implemented in its first year and determine facilitators and barriers to implementation.

METHODS: Data were collected in 2016-2017, through 17 telephone interviews and focus groups with 39 participants. Participants were OORP staff and stakeholders selected through purposeful, non-random sampling. Standardized, open-ended interview guides were used. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify, analyze, and report overall patterns.

RESULTS: Participants detailed stories from the field and policymakers illuminated the process of implementation.

FINDINGS revealed logistical barriers to treatment including patients' lack of insurance and cell phones, lack of immediately available detox beds, and program ineligibility for some patients due to medical conditions. The model using peers as first responders had a positive impact as their experiences with addiction enabled them to more successfully engage patients. The PNs were critical in addressing high needs for case management and referral and external partners were also important for implementation.

CONCLUSIONS: Results underscore the effort needed to integrate this important model within EDs as part of a multi-level approach to address opioid misuse. The identified challenges led to statewide strategic planning and areas for further development. OORP is a promising intervention that might increase the number of individuals suffering with opioid disorders linked to peer support, treatment and recovery.

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Language: en

Keywords

Opioid misuse; Opioid overdose; Peer support; Recovery