SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Bini R, Wundersitz DWT, Kingsley M. Appl. Ergon. 2019; 75: 243-249.

Affiliation

La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.apergo.2018.11.004

PMID

30509532

Abstract

This study quantified the biomechanical (movements and forces) and physiological (energy expenditure) demands of postal delivery performed with electrically assisted bicycles (EABs). Ten postal workers and 10 recreational athletes performed three simulated postal tasks (simulated mail delivery circuit, delivery distance [close vs. far], and 3-min stationary cycling) while carrying 0, 16 and 32 kg. Physiological (energy expenditure) and biomechanical (internal and external forces and joint angles) responses were calculated. Energy expenditure (10-20%; p < 0.05) and power output (30-44%; p < 0.05) increased with increasing mail loads. Ground reaction force increased (∼10%) for the far delivery distance, but joint reaction forces were unchanged. Lower hip flexion (p < 0.01), less hip abduction (p < 0.01) and larger spine anterior flexion (p < 0.01) were observed for the far delivery distance. Joint forces were not affected by the mail load transported (0-32 kg) or distance from the mailbox (close vs far). EABs can provide a suitable transportation method to assist mail delivery in terms of energy expenditure reduction.

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Ground reaction force; Joint forces; Motion analysis; Postal workers

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print