SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Samoborec S, Ayton D, Ruseckaite R, Winbolt G, Evans SM. J. Rehabil. Med. 2019; 51(2): 120-126.

Affiliation

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, , 3004 Melbourne, Australia. stella.samoborec@monash.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Foundation for Rehabilitation Information)

DOI

10.2340/16501977-2500

PMID

30426136

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand clients' experiences of the recovery journey through the compensation system and to identify areas and strategies for quality improvement.

METHODS: A qualitative study of 23 participants with physical or mental disabilities caused by traffic accidents, which occurred, on average, 4 years ago. Purposive sampling of long-term recovery clients who made a compensation claim after their injuries was applied until data saturation was reached. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analysed through conventional thematic analysis.

RESULTS: This study demonstrated that recovery is a complex phenomenon that can be impacted by numerous challenges of navigating the compensation system and using its services. Clients perceived the compensation provider as limited in rules around which services they could access. A common perception amongst clients was that the compensation provider did not have the capacity and knowledge to understand health and recovery processes nor did it provide adequate guidelines or instructions that would assist clients with their recovery. Many clients dealt with numerous case managers and felt insufficiently informed on what to expect and do, which led to a lack of trust in rehabilitation management and case managers' decisions. According to clients, financial impacts were neglected and not addressed effectively. Many clients felt abandoned by the system which led to perceived feelings of desertion and negligence.

CONCLUSION: Understanding modifiable barriers to recovery in compensation systems presents opportunities to amend current practices and consider a holistic, person-centred care approach. It is apparent that improved recovery management, communication and adequate provision of guidelines are needed to meet clients' needs and facilitate better outcomes. A person-centred care approach is likely to improve quality of life and help clients navigate the compensation system more effectively with assistance from health and compensation professionals, who should be actively involved in their recovery processes.


Language: en

Keywords

healthoutcomes; minorinjuries; person-centredcare; recovery; roadtrauma

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print