SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Joiner TE, Simpson S, Rogers ML, Stanley IH, Galynker II. J. Psychiatr. Pract. 2018; 24(4): 274-278.

Affiliation

JOINER, ROGERS, and STANLEY: Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL SIMPSON: Law Offices of Skip Simpson, Frisco, TX GALYNKER: Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/PRA.0000000000000315

PMID

30427811

Abstract

Separate research groups have independently argued the need for a suicide-specific diagnosis within the psychiatric diagnostic nomenclature. Although a suicide-specific diagnosis could possibly enhance clinical care and improve patient safety, some clinicians have expressed concerns regarding the legal risk of utilizing a suicide-specific diagnosis. In this column, the first of a 2-part series exploring the potential risks and benefits of a suicide-specific diagnosis, the authors draw from their decades of experience in clinical work, legal consulting, as well as the litigation of suicide and wrongful death lawsuits and contend that the bona fide use of a suicide-specific diagnosis would mitigate legal liability to clinicians.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print