Citation

Winters M, Fischer J, Nelson T, Fuller D, Whitehurst DGT. Transp. Res. Rec. 2018; 2672(36): 24-32.

Affiliation

Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada 2School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 3School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada 4Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada Corresponding Author: Address correspondence to Meghan Winters: mwinters@sfu.ca

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences USA, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0361198118791630

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The impacts of active transportation planning on equity are often overlooked, potentially leading to disparities in who receives benefits of infrastructure investment. This study examined income inequalities in spatial access to bicycling infrastructure in three mid-sized Canadian cities: Victoria and Kelowna (British Columbia), and Halifax (Nova Scotia), using non-spatial and spatial methods. We compiled municipal bicycling infrastructure data and calculated access to bicycling infrastructure (m/km2) for dissemination areas (DAs) within each city. We analyzed trends in access across median household income quintiles, and characterized spatial patterns using a local measure of spatial autocorrelation. DAs in Kelowna (n = 168) had the greatest access to infrastructure (median infrastructure = 2,915 m/km2), followed by Victoria (n = 386 DAs; median = 2,157 m/km2), and Halifax (n = 312 DAs; median = 0 m/km2). Lower income areas in Victoria and Kelowna had greater access to infrastructure compared with higher income areas. The majority of DAs in Halifax had no infrastructure (59%), consistent across income quintiles. Spatial pattern analysis identified clusters of low income areas with poor access in each city, which may be targets for strategic, equitable investment. Although in many cities bicycling infrastructure planning is not driven by equity considerations, there is increasing political pressure to ensure equitable access to safe bicycling. Measuring and mapping trends in access to transportation resources from an equity perspective are requisite steps in the pathway toward healthy, sustainable cities for all.

Language: en