Citation

Gold LH, Vanderpool D. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 2018; 46(3): 309-321.

Affiliation

Dr. Gold is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Arlington, VA. Ms. Vanderpool is Vice President for Risk Management, Professional Risk Management Services, Inc., Arlington, VA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Publisher American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law)

DOI

10.29158/JAAPL.003768-18

PMID

30368463

Abstract

In the preceding article, we reviewed the current state of federal and state regulation of restoration of firearms rights, termed "relief from disability (RFD)," for those who have had those rights suspended due to mental health prohibitors. This review demonstrated that these laws vary widely and at times create situations in which firearms rights may be effectively banned indefinitely. In this article, we review due process and psychiatric evidentiary requirements in RFD hearings. The legal procedures and evidentiary standards in RFD judicial or administrative hearings also vary widely and typically do not include a current psychiatric violence or suicide risk assessment. The psychiatric and policy implications of RFD practices are also discussed in regard to mental health firearm prohibitors, restoration of gun rights, and implications for future policy regarding firearms regulations affecting those with serious mental illness.

© 2018 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

Language: en