Citation

Bach M. Theor. Med. Bioeth. 2018; 39(4): 283-299.

Affiliation

Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA. michelle.bach@slu.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s11017-018-9451-2

PMID

30120696

Abstract

Violence in psychiatric clinics has been a consistent problem since the birth of modern psychiatry. In this paper, I examine current efforts to understand and reduce both violence and coercive responses to violence in psychiatry, arguing that these efforts are destined to fall short. By and large, scholarship on psychiatric violence reduction has focused on identifying discrete factors that are statistically associated with violence, such as patient demographics and clinical qualities, in an effort to quantify risk and predict violent acts before they happen. Using the work of Horkheimer and Adorno, I characterize the theoretical orientation of such efforts as identity thinking. I then argue that these approaches lead to epistemic imperceptiveness and a subtle form of conceptual restraint on patients. I suggest a reorientation in psychiatric research, away from identity thinking and toward a more productive and just approach to the problem of violence in psychiatric clinics.

Language: en

Keywords

Adorno; Critical theory; Identity thinking; Psychiatry; Research; Violence