SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Soto PH, Reid NE, Litovitz TL. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2019; 37(5): 805-809.

Affiliation

National Capital Poison Center, Washington, DC, United States; Department of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States; Department of Emergency Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States. Electronic address: toby@poison.org.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.ajem.2018.07.035

PMID

30054113

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: New strategies recently proposed to mitigate injury caused by lithium coin cell batteries lodged in the esophagus include prehospital administration of honey to coat the battery and prevent local hydroxide generation and in-hospital administration of sucralfate suspension (or honey). This study was undertaken to define the safe interval for administering coating agents by identifying the timing of onset of esophageal perforations.

METHODS: A retrospective study of 290 fatal or severe battery ingestions with esophageal lodgment was undertaken to identify cases with esophageal perforations.

RESULTS: Esophageal perforations were identified in 189 cases (53 fatal, 136 severe; 95.2% in children ≤4 years). Implicated batteries were predominantly lithium (91.0%) and 92.0% were ≥20 mm diameter. Only 2% of perforations occurred in <24 h following ingestion, including 3 severe cases with perforations evident at 11-17 h, 12 h, and 18 h. Another 7.4% of perforations (11 cases) became evident 24 to 47 h post ingestion and 10.1% of perforations (15 cases) became evident 48 to 71 h post ingestion. By 3 days post ingestion, 26.8% of perforations were evident, 36.9% by 4 days, 46.3% by 5 days, and 66.4% by 9 days.

CONCLUSION: Esophageal perforation is unlikely in the 12 h after battery ingestion, therefore the administration of honey or sucralfate carries a low risk of extravasation from the esophagus. This first 12 h includes the period of peak electrolysis activity and battery damage, thus the risk of honey or sucralfate is low while the benefit is likely high.

Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.


Language: en

Keywords

Button battery; Esophageal injury; Esophageal perforation; Foreign body ingestion

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print