Citation

Sajjad T, Härdig AC. Terrorism Polit. Violence 2017; 29(6): 1106-1125.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/09546553.2015.1127807

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Over the past decades, a pattern has emerged across the Islamic world of secular actors struggling to build sustainable social movements while Islamists show a higher success rate in doing so--a dynamic often accompanied by high levels of violence and little space for dialogue between actors from across the political spectrum. In this article, we illustrate the utility of social movement theory (SMT) in explaining the ability of some movements to mobilize en masse, while others become marginalized. Furthermore, we suggest that SMT is useful in understanding the processes that produce socio-political dynamics conducive to violent rather than non-violent tactics. Through a case study of Bangladesh, where in 2013 the secular Shahbag mobilization was derailed by a massive Islamist counter-mobilization, this article shows how movements not only capitalize on, but actually contribute to, shifts in cultural discourse through political maneuvering and long-term socialization. By anchoring their ideology in pre-existing religio-cultural imagery, Islamists have been successful in casting themselves as "authentic" defenders of Islam and their secular opponents as "atheists." In such a socio-political context, the space for dialogue among the various political actors is severely limited and the impetus to employ violent tactics strong.

Language: en

Keywords

Bangladesh; discourse; Islamism; political violence; secularism; social movements