SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Hastings RP, Gillespie D, Flynn S, McNamara R, Taylor Z, Knight R, Randell E, Richards L, Moody G, Mitchell A, Przybylak P, Williams B, Hunt PH. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 2018; 62(9): 798-813.

Affiliation

Mencap Cymru, Cardiff, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/jir.12536

PMID

30033655

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One in five adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) known to services display challenging behaviours (CBs), and these individuals are at risk for restrictive practices and poor care. Staff attitudes may contribute to the development and/or maintenance of CBs. We investigated the effectiveness of co-produced Who's Challenging Who? training delivered by people with ID to staff.

METHOD: This study involved a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of Who's Challenging Who? training with follow-up at six and 20 weeks post-randomisation. PARTICIPANTS: two staff from each of 118 residential care settings for adults with ID at least one of whom displayed aggressive CB. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Self-reported Staff Empathy for people with Challenging Behaviour Questionnaire. ANALYSIS: intention to treat of all randomised settings. ISCRTN registration: ISRCTN53763600.

RESULTS: 118 residential settings (including 236 staff) were randomised to either receive training (59 settings) or to receive training after a delay (59 settings). The primary analysis included data from 121 staff in 76 settings (51% of staff, 64% of settings). The adjusted mean difference on the transformed (cubed) Staff Empathy for people with Challenging Behaviour Questionnaire score at the primary end point was 1073.2 (95% CI: -938.1 to 3084.5, P = 0.296) in favour of the intervention group (effect size Cohen's d = .19).

CONCLUSIONS: This is the first large-scale RCT of a co-produced training course delivered by people with ID.

FINDINGS indicated a small positive (but statistically non-significant) effect on increased staff empathy at 20 weeks, and small to moderate effects for staff reported secondary outcomes in favour of the intervention group.

© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research published by MENCAP and International Association of the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disibilities and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Language: en

Keywords

burnout; challenging behaviour; empathy; randomised controlled trial; staff training; work stress

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print