SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Yan X, Zhang X, Xue Q. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2018; 119: 162-175.

Affiliation

MOE Key Laboratory for Urban Transportation Complex System Theory and Technology, School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 100044, PR China.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.015

PMID

30036817

Abstract

Restricted intersection field of view (IFOV) can influence drivers' hazard detection abilities and driving safety in an emergent traffic event. However, no field studies or crash-data analyses have been conducted to prove the adequateness of the current intersection sight-distance design standards, which are adopted to ensure that the approaching-intersection drivers have a sufficient field of view to detect traffic hazards and travel safely at intersections. In this study, we conducted a driving simulator experiment to compare drivers' behavioral and eye-movement measures between different IFOV conditions that met the current intersection sight distance design standards. We examined the influencing mechanism of IFOV on the drivers' collision avoidance process being composed of three consequential stages, respectively in terms of search stage, decision stage and action stage. Our experiment results showed that restricted IFOV impacts the three-stage driving performance interlockingly. Enlarging IFOV can significantly improve drivers' performance in detecting a conflicting vehicle more timely, having a longer perception-reaction time in monitoring the hazard, spending more time on observing intersection surroundings, and taking brake actions earlier and more smoothly so that drivers were more likely to successfully avoid colliding with the conflicting vehicle. In addition, we found that compared with female drivers, male drivers were less likely to take brake actions to avoid a potential collision and had a lower deceleration rate in the braking stage of collision avoidance while there was no significant gender difference in crash involvement rates. The findings indicated that male drivers were more skillful in vehicle control than female drivers. Nevertheless, male drivers had less traffic-crash expectation, which degraded their overall crash avoidance effect. Considering the traffic safety that more than five million intersection-related crashes occur in American each year, these experimental findings have implications for public safety and health.

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Behavioral and eye-movement measures; Collision avoidance process; Hazard detection abilities; IFOV conditions; Traffic safety

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print