Citation

Kollock RO, Hale D, Vogelpohl R, Kremer L, Horner J, Cox C, Allen M. Int. J. Exerc. Sci. 2018; 11(1): 648-656.

Affiliation

Department of Kinesiology and Health, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Western Kentucky University)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

29997722

Abstract

Body armor is essential to the protection of military personnel; however, body armor may impede the users balance and movement quality. A better understanding of the influence of body armor on balance and movement quality may help in the development of new guidelines for training standards and procedures to mitigate the risk of injury associated with wearing of body armor in warfighters. The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of body armor (combat boots, tactical vest and combat helmet) on balance and movement quality in male military cadets and personnel. Twelve male participants completed the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) under two separate conditions, body armor and non-body armor.

RESULTS indicated a significant difference in FMS composite score between the non-body armor and body armor conditions (p =.012), with the non-body armor condition resulting in significantly higher FMS scores than the body armor condition. Additionally, the FMS item score for shoulder mobility was significantly higher (2.25±0.62) in the non-body armor condition than the body armor condition (p= 0.03). The SEBT composite and the three individual reach distances were not significantly different between conditions. Based on the current findings, body armor within a 4.8 kg - 5.3 kg range does appear to impact movement quality as evaluated using the FMS in male military personnel and cadets. More research is needed to determine a threshold of compensatory movement patterns relative to an increase in body armor weight.

Language: en

Keywords

FMS; load carriage; military; postural control