Citation

Teeuw AH, Kraan RBJ, van Rijn RR, Bossuyt PMM, Heymans HSA. Acta Paediatr. 2019; 108(2): 300-313.

Affiliation

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/apa.14495

PMID

29992712

Abstract

AIM: We studied the accuracy of a screening checklist (SPUTOVAMO), complete physical examination (top-to-toe inspection, TTI) and their combination in detecting child abuse in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted to the ED of the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam between January 2011 and 1 July 2013 were included. An Expert Panel assigned a consensus diagnosis to positive cases. For all other and missed cases, the Child Abuse Counselling and Reporting Centre diagnosis was used.

RESULTS: We included 17,229 admissions of 12,198 patients. In 46% SPUTOVAMO was performed, in 33% TTI; 421 children (4.3%) tested positive on either or both, with 68 positive consensus diagnoses. In eight children not reported to the Expert Panel the Child Abuse Counselling and Reporting Center diagnosis was positive. Ten of 3,519 (0.3%) children testing negative on both were child abuse cases; 0.88% of the study group had a final child abuse diagnosis. The estimated PPV was 0.46 for SPUTOVAMO, 0.44 for TTI and 0.43 for the combination.

CONCLUSION: Combining screening tests significantly increased the number of test positives and led to more child abuse cases detected. Combined screening for child abuse in all children less than 18 years old presenting to an ED is recommended. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Language: en

Keywords

Checklist; Child abuse and neglect; Diagnostic accuracy; Emergency department; Physical examination