SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Obregón-Biosca SA, Betanzo-Quezada E, Romero-Navarrete JA, Ríos-Nuñez M. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2018; 56: 33-45.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.trf.2018.03.033

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In the context of road safety, improvements in road traffic education have been recognized in several countries as an instrument for reducing road accidents. However, the level of road safety education imparted by different institutions lacks an objective performance measure regarding the level of awareness that different participants in the transport process have concerning road transportation risks. Based on an analytical hierarchy process to weigh the relative importance of different questions, in this paper, the fundamentals of a road safety questionnaire are presented and discussed, including the corresponding references for the contents of each question. This test was designed for six road transport participants: car drivers and passengers; public bus, motorcycle and bicycle riders; and pedestrians. For each of these participants, six areas of knowledge were addressed: applied situations, courtesy and urbanity, infrastructure, safety and human factors, traffic signals and rules/recommendations. The target population for applying the test was the inhabitants of the City of Santiago de Queretaro, Mexico. For a grading scale of 1 to 10, the lowest and highest grades were obtained by motorcycle riders (5.72) and pedestrians (8.84), respectively, which denotes the need for better instructions for motorcyclists regarding road safety.


Language: en

Keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Mexico; Rating; Road education; Safety

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print