SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Formisano A, Castaldo C, Chiumiento G. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 2017; 13(11): 1373-1389.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/15732479.2016.1268174

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In the paper, the seismic retrofitting of an existing reinforced concrete school building located in the district of Naples has been examined. The school, which was designed to sustain gravity load only, is composed of seven constructions separated with seismic joints. One of these constructions has been retrofitted with different intervention techniques, namely reinforced concrete walls, steel concentric, eccentric and buckling restrained braces and steel shear panels, whose non-linear behaviour under seismic actions in terms of performance point detection have been evaluated and compared using Capacity Spectrum Method. Finally, the choice of the best intervention technique from economic, structural and environmental point of view has been done utilising an efficient multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method, the so-called TOPSIS method. From the performed analyses it was found that buckling restrained braces provide optimal solution for the seismic upgrading of the examined reinforced concrete school building.


Language: en

Keywords

buckling restrained braces; MCDM methods; reinforced concrete school buildings; Retrofitting interventions; steel bracings; steel plate shear walls

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print