Citation

He JC, Sajankila N, Kreiner LA, Allen DL, Claridge JA. Am. Surg. 2018; 84(4): 557-564.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Southeastern Surgical Congress)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

29712606

Abstract

The optimal number of level I trauma centers (L1TCs) in a region has not been elucidated. To begin addressing this, we compared mortalities for patients treated in counties or regions with 1 L1TC to those with >1 L1TC across Ohio. Ohio Trauma Registry data from 2010 to 2012 were analyzed. Patients with age ≥15 from counties/regions with L1TC were included. Region was defined as a L1TC containing county and its neighboring counties. Two analyses were performed. In the county analysis, counties containing 1 L1TC were compared with counties with multiple L1TCs. This comparison is repeated on a regional level for the regional analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed. 38,661 and 55,064 patients were in the county and regional analysis, respectively. Patients treated in counties or regions with multiple L1TCs were significantly younger (P < 0.001). Despite this, the mortality was similar for the two groups in the county analysis and significantly higher for regions with multiple L1TCs (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that having multiple L1TC coverage in a region was an independent predictor for death (odds ratios: 1.17; 1.07-1.28; P = 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that mortality in counties and regions with multiple L1TCs was not lower in any subgroups but was higher in patients with age ≥65 and patients with blunt injuries (P < 0.05). Having multiple L1TCs in a county was associated with increased mortality in certain patient subgroups. Having multiple L1TCs in a region was an independent predictor for death. These results should be considered carefully when designing future regionalized trauma networks. More L1TCs is not necessarily better.

Language: en