Citation

Hagemeister C, Krause J, Bunte H. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2018; 55: 483-491.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.011

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Tricycles could help to improve the traffic safety of cyclists as they make it easier to deal with bad surfaces. They are an option to ensure independent mobility for persons who cannot ride a bicycle. But on roads tricycles are rare. Compared to bikes, trikes are considered to have substantial disadvantages. In this study, differences between persons who can imagine going on a trial ride with a trike and persons who cannot imagine going on a trial ride are assessed. In effect, practical differences between bikes and trikes are unimportant, as is safety perception. What is important is how far a trike is associated with age and disability, how well it fits to the individual's lifestyle and whether it is seen as sporty. For the marketing of trikes, safety arguments are irrelevant; references to a "senior" product could be counterproductive.

Language: en

Keywords

Cyclist; Elderly; Lifestyle; Marketing; Traffic safety; Tricycle