Citation

Mabee B, Vucetic S. Secur. Dialogue 2018; 49(1-2): 96-108.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0967010617730948

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Militarism - a mercurial, endlessly contested concept - is experiencing a renaissance of sorts in many corners of the social science community. In critical security studies, the concept's purview has become increasingly limited by an abiding theoretical and analytical focus on various practices of securitization. We argue that there is a need to clarify the logic and stakes of different forms of militarism. Critical security scholars have provided valuable insights into the conditions of 'exceptionalist militarism'. However, if we accept that militarism and the production of security are co-constitutive, then there is every reason to consider different manifestations of militarism, their historical trajectories and their interrelationships. To that end, we draw on the work of historical sociologists and articulate three more ideal types of militarism: nation-state militarism, civil society militarism and neoliberal militarism. We suggest this typology can more adequately capture key transformations of militarism in the modern period as well as inform further research on the militarism-security nexus.

Language: en