Citation

Schaefer M, Cherkasskiy L, Denke C, Spies C, Song H, Malahy S, Heinz A, Ströhle A, Bargh JA. Sci. Rep. 2018; 8(1): e6039.

Affiliation

Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1038/s41598-018-23586-x

PMID

29662068

Abstract

Extralegal factors may influence judicial outcomes. Here we investigated the experience of incidental haptic sensations on the harshness of punishment recommendations. Based on recent theories of embodiment, which claim that cognitive representations are structured by metaphorical mappings from sensory experience, we hypothesized that tactile priming with hard objects would cause subjects to recommend harsher sentences (to be 'hard on crime'). Furthermore, the theory of embodiment predicts that this effect should be based on sensorimotor brain activation during the judging process. In order to test this we presented participants with scenarios that described various crimes while scanning their brain activity with fMRI. Participants were then asked to rate how severely they would sentence the delinquents. Before the scenarios, the participants were primed by touching either a hard or a soft object.

RESULTS revealed tha t hard priming led participants to recommend harder punishments. These results were accompanied by activation of somatosensory brain areas during the judging phase. This outcome is in line with simulation assumptions of the embodiment theory and proposes a central role of the sensorimotor cortices for embodied metaphors. Thus, incidental tactile experiences can influence our abstract cognitions and even how hard we are on criminals.

Language: en