Citation

Li G, Wang F, Otte D, Cai Z, Simms CK. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2018; 115: 143-150.

Affiliation

Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: csimms@tcd.ie.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.014

PMID

29571012

Abstract

Subsystem impactor tests are the main approaches for evaluation of safety performance of vehicle front design for pedestrian protection in legislative regulations. However, the main aspects of vehicle safety for pedestrians are shape and stiffness, and though it is clear that subsystem impact tests encourage lower vehicle front stiffness, it is unclear whether they promote improved vehicle front shapes for pedestrian protection. The purpose of this paper is therefore to investigate the effects of European pedestrian safety regulations on passenger car front shape and pedestrian injury risk using recent German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) pedestrian collision data and numerical simulations. Firstly, a sample of 579 pedestrian collision cases involving 190 different car models between 2000-2015 extracted from the GIDAS was used to compare front-end shapes of passenger cars manufactured before and after the legislative pedestrian safety regulations were introduced in Europe. The focus was on changes in passenger car front shape and differences in pedestrian AIS2+ (Abbreviated Injury Scale at least level 2) leg, pelvis/femur and head injury risk observed in collisions. Multi-body simulations were also used to assess changes in vehicle aggressivity due to the observed changes in vehicle shape. The results show that newer passenger cars tend to have a flatter and wider bumper, higher bonnet leading edge, shorter and steeper bonnet and a shallower windscreen. Both the collision data and the numerical simulations indicate that newer passenger car front bumper designs are significantly safer for pedestrians' legs. However, the results also show that the higher bonnet leading edge in newer passenger cars is poor for pedestrian pelvis/femur protection, even though newer cars show an obviously lower AIS2+ injury risk to younger pedestrians in collisions. Newer cars have a lower AIS2+ head injury risk for pedestrians in collisions, but the numerical analysis indicate that this is not likely due to shape changes in passenger car fronts. Overall, the introduction of pedestrian safety regulations has resulted in reductions in pedestrian injury risk, but further benefits would accrue from tests which promote a lower bonnet leading edge. The influence of vehicle shape on pedestrian head injury risk remains unclear.

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Language: en

Keywords

Collision data; Legislative regulations; Numerical simulation; Passenger car front shape; Pedestrian injury risk