Citation

Kidnie S, Cruz MG, Gould J, Nichols D, Anderson W, Bessell R. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2015; 24(6): 828-837.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, International Association of Wildland Fire, Fire Research Institute, Publisher CSIRO Publishing)

DOI

10.1071/WF14145

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Grass senescence, or grassland curing, is a dynamic process in which grass fuels transition from a live to dead state and, in turn, influence fire dynamics. In the present study we examined the process of curing with specific consideration of changes in fuel structure that will affect potential fire behaviour. Our sampling protocol expanded the fuel component groups from two (live and dead) to four (green, senescing, new dead and old dead fuel). We found that all these components had significant fuel moisture content differences, thereby justifying our sampling protocol. Visual curing assessment predominantly resulted in an over-prediction bias of curing level and failed to capture the effect of the senescing process on fuel availability to combust due to misclassification of fuel components (e.g. senescing fuels with high fuel moisture content were classified as dead fuels because of their colouration). Models were developed to estimate the: (1) proportion of senescing and green fuels from knowledge of the current year's dead fuel proportion; and (2) actual curing level from fuel moisture content and soil dryness level.

Language: en