SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Tanase MA, Panciera R, Lowell K, Aponte C. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2015; 24(4): 560-572.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, International Association of Wildland Fire, Fire Research Institute, Publisher CSIRO Publishing)

DOI

10.1071/WF14149

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Timely information on spatial variation of live fuel moisture is critical for fire risk assessment and behaviour modelling. Using an airborne synthetic aperture radar system, the sensitivity of radar data to live fuel (i.e. canopy foliage) moisture was evaluated. Field and airborne measurements were collected over a 3-week period in a semiarid Australian forest dominated by white cypress pine (Callitris glaucophylla). Linear regression models were used to relate equivalent water thickness and live fuel moisture content to backscatter intensity and polarimetric decomposition components.

RESULTS showed that radar systems can provide estimates of live fuel moisture with similar or better accuracies for both equivalent water thickness (R2 = 0.7-0.8, root mean squared error (RMSE) = 15%) and live fuel moisture content (R2 = 0.6-0.7, RMSE = 10%) than those achieved in previous studies using optical-based vegetation indices. It was also possible to estimate soil moisture under the forest canopy with accuracies of 0.05 volume/volume (v v-1) (R2 = 0.5-0.6). This is particularly relevant in the context of fire management because moisture availability of fine fuels is related to soil water content.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print