SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Anciaes PR, Jones P, Metcalfe PJ. Transp. Policy 2018; 64: 10-19.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.01.007

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This paper uses a stated preference survey to estimate the value of reductions in community severance (the "barrier effect" of transport infrastructure on pedestrians). The survey was conducted in four urban areas in England. Participants were asked whether they would cross a road without designated crossing facilities in order to access a cheaper shop or a bus stop on the other side of the road, instead of a more expensive one on their side of the road. This method provides information for the inclusion of severance effects in the appraisal of interventions to change road design and to control motorised traffic. The estimated value per walking trip of reducing the number of vehicle lanes from 3 to 2 and from 2 to 1 is £1.28 and £1.00 respectively. The value of adding a central reservation (median strip) is £1.08. The value of reducing traffic levels from medium to low and from high to medium is £0.76 and £1.08 respectively The value of reducing speed limits below 30mph is £0.45. These values depend on age, gender, disability, health condition, mobility restrictions, qualifications, location, and walking behaviour.


Language: en

Keywords

Pedestrians; Barrier effect; Community severance; Economic valuation; Stated preference

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print