SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Brett BL, Kuhn AW, Yengo-Kahn AM, Solomon GS, Zuckerman SL. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2018; 33(8): 984-992.

Affiliation

Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1093/arclin/acy006

PMID

29471410

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The empirical identification of risk factors associated with sport-related concussion (SRC) may improve the management of student-athletes. The current study attempted to identify and quantify bio-cognitive risk factors associated with sustaining a SRC.

METHODS: Cross-sectional ambispective study; level of evidence, 3. Neurocognitive testing of 12,320 middle school, high school and collegiate athletes was completed at preseason baseline and post-SRC. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to determine which pre-injury variables accurately predicted the occurrence of SRC. A quantitative risk score for each variable was developed.

RESULTS: Five of 13 variables maintained significance in the multivariable model with the associated weighted point scores: SRC history (21), prior headache treatment (6), contact sport (5), youth level of play (7), and history of ADHD/LD (2). Six stratified groups were formed based on probability of SRC, which produced an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71 (95% CI 0.69-0.72, p <.001). Though the model was a significant predictor of SRC (X2 = 1,112.75, p <.001), the effect size was small and accounted for only 16% of the overall variance.

CONCLUSIONS: An initial aggregate model of weighted bio-cognitive factors associated with increased odds of sustaining a SRC was developed. Previously validated factors were confirmed, yet a large source of variance remained unexplained. These findings emphasize the need to expand the host factors studied when assessing SRC risk, and that the existing, empirically based bio-cognitive factors do not adequately quantify the risk of SRC.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print