Citation

Peckover S, Smith S, Wondergem F. Child Abuse Rev. 2015; 24(5): 365-377.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/car.2301

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Serious Case Reviews (SCRs), undertaken when a child has died or been seriously harmed, are an important feature of child protection in England. They are substantial exercises, but little research has examined the everyday work processes associated with their production. This study, undertaken during 2011, explored the views and experiences of NHS Named and Designated Nurses and Doctors for Safeguarding Children about their involvement in SCRs. Nineteen telephone interviews were undertaken and the data thematically analysed. The study found that doing SCRs involved additional work and staff did not always feel fully supported or prepared. Doing SCRs is a rigid and bureaucratic process which sometimes detracted from the case itself. The study also found mixed views about the value of SCRs and the extent to which they promote learning and child-centred practice. The findings contribute to overall understanding of how this process is undertaken, and help open up to scrutiny the work required and the challenges generated for those involved in SCRs. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

'Doing SCRs is a rigid and bureaucratic process which sometimes detracted from the case itself'


Key Practitioner Message:

* SCRs are substantial exercises; little previous research has examined their production.

* Undertaking SCRs requires considerable time, effort and can be emotionally difficult; NHS staff involved in their production face challenges in doing this work.

* Producing SCRs may distract from the value of the outcomes and the extent to which they promote learning and child-centred practice.

Language: en