SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Poritz JMP, Sherer M, Kisala PA, Tulsky D, Leon-Novelo L, Ngan E. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2018; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.apmr.2017.11.018

PMID

29407517

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the responsiveness of the Traumatic Brain Injury - Quality of Life (TBI-QOL) measurement system.

DESIGN: Participants completed the 20 TBI-QOL item banks and the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools - Objective (PART-O) Productivity Subscale at baseline and 6-month follow-up assessments. Participants were categorized into three groups (increased productivity, unchanged productivity, and decreased productivity) based on PART-O Productivity scores. Paired sample t-tests were used to compare TBI-QOL scores at baseline and 6 months, and standardized response means and Cohen's d were computed to estimate effect sizes. SETTING: 3 TBI Model Systems rehabilitation centers in the U.S. PARTICIPANTS: 201 community-dwelling adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 20 TBI-QOL item banks.

RESULTS: As expected, given that there was no intervention, group mean TBI-QOL subdomain scores for the entire sample showed no change or small improvement over the 6-month study period. At the follow-up assessment, 72 participants reported increased productivity, 71 reported decreased productivity, and 58 reported the same level of productivity as they had 6 months prior. When compared with participants who reported unchanged or decreased productivity, participants who reported increased productivity on the PART-O had clinically meaningful (d ≥ 0.30) improvements on seven TBI-QOL measures. The largest improvement was in Independence (mean change, 7.06; d =.84), with differences also observed in the Mobility, Positive Affect and Well-Being, Resilience, Grief/Loss, Ability to Participate, and Satisfaction with Participation subdomains.

CONCLUSIONS: The 20 TBI-QOL item banks demonstrate responsiveness to change and measurement stability in a community-dwelling sample. Researchers may use the TBI-QOL to detect changes in HRQOL following a clinical intervention and clinicians may use it in their daily practices to monitor patient recovery.

Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.


Language: en

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury; health-related quality of life; patient reported outcome measure

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print