SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Rocha LA, Fromknecht CQ, Redman SD, Brady J. Acad. Forensic Pathol. 2017; 7(2): 221-239.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, National Association of Medical Examiners)

DOI

10.23907/2017.023

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

BackgroundThe number of disaster-related deaths recorded by vital statistics departments often differs from that reported by other agencies, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-National Weather Service storm database and the American Red Cross. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has launched an effort to improve disaster-related death scene investigation reporting practices to make data more comparable across jurisdictions, improve accuracy of reporting disaster-related deaths, and enhance identification of risk and protective factors. We conducted a literature review to examine how death scene data are collected and how such data are used to determine disaster relatedness.

METHODSTwo analysts conducted a parallel search using Google and Google Scholar. We reviewed published peer-reviewed articles and unpublished documents including relevant forms, protocols, and worksheets from coroners, medical examiners, and death scene investigators.

RESULTSWe identified 177 documents: 32 published peer-reviewed articles and 145 other documents (grey literature). Published articles suggested no consistent approach for attributing deaths to a disaster. Researchers generally depended on death certificates to identify disaster-related deaths; several studies also drew on supplemental sources, including medical examiner, coroner, and active surveillance reports.

CONCLUSIONSThese results highlight the critical importance of consistent, accurate data collection during a death investigation. Review of the grey literature found variation in use of death scene data collection tools, indicating the potential for widespread inconsistency in data captured for routine reporting and public health surveillance.

FINDINGS from this review will be used to develop guidelines and tools for capturing disaster-related death investigation data.

© 2018 Academic Forensic Pathology Inc.

Forensic pathology Medicolegal death investigation; Mass fatality management; Mortality surveillance; Medical examiners; Coroners; Natural disasters


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print