SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Gilson T, Rendon C, Pinjuh J. Acad. Forensic Pathol. 2017; 7(1): 87-90.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, National Association of Medical Examiners)

DOI

10.23907/2017.010

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

As the opiate/opioid crisis has worsened in the United States, one of the law enforcement responses has involved increased efforts to prosecute the individuals responsible for the distribution of illicit drugs that result in overdoses. When mixed intoxications occur, the controlling decision for prosecution is Burrage v. United States (2014), which provides guidance on the types of evidence required for establishment of causation. In many types of legal proceedings, forensic pathologists are called to provide expert testimony, although they may be unaware of the burden of proof that is required in a given case. This paper seeks to elaborate upon the burden of proof in drug overdose prosecutions with the guidance of Burrage and offer insight into the expectations and limitations involved in these cases.

© 2018 Academic Forensic Pathology International

Keywords: Forensic pathology, Opioids, Prosecutions, Intoxication


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print