Citation

Baker WL, Williams MA. Ecol. Appl. 2018; 28(2): 284-290.

Affiliation

Program in Ecology/Department of Geography, Dept. 3371, 1000 E. University Ave., University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Ecological Society of America)

DOI

10.1002/eap.1688

PMID

29345744

Abstract

An understanding of how historical fire and structure in dry forests (ponderosa pine, dry mixed conifer) varied across the western USA remains incomplete. Yet, fire strongly affects ecosystem services, and forest restoration programs are underway. We used General Land Office survey reconstructions from the late-1800s across 11 landscapes covering ∼1.9 million ha in four states to analyze spatial variation in fire regimes and forest structure. We first synthesized the state of validation of our methods using 20 modern validations, 53 historical cross-validations, and corroborating evidence. These show our method creates accurate reconstructions with low errors. One independent modern test reported high error, but did not replicate our method and made many calculation errors. Using reconstructed parameters of historical fire regimes and forest structure from our validated methods, forests were found to be non-uniform across the 11 landscapes, but grouped together in three geographical areas. Each had a mixture of fire severities, but dominated by low-severity fire and low median tree density in Arizona, mixed-severity fire and intermediate to high median tree density in Oregon-California, and high-severity fire and intermediate median tree density in Colorado. Programs to restore fire and forest structure could benefit from regional frameworks, rather than one-size-fits-all. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Language: en

Keywords

General Land Office surveys; dry forests; fire regimes; fire severity; forest structure; geographical variation; restoration