Citation

Tresilian JR. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1999; 3(8): 301-310.

Affiliation

Perception and Motor Systems Laboratory, Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01352-2

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Bringing about desirable collisions (making interceptions) and avoiding unwanted collisions are critically important sensorimotor skills, which appear to require us to estimate the time remaining before collision occurs (time-to-collision). Until recently the theoretical approach to understanding time-to-collision estimation has been dominated by the tau-hypothesis, which has its origins in J.J. Gibson's ecological approach to perception. The hypothesis proposes that a quantity (tau), present in the visual stimulus, provides the necessary time-to-collision information. Empirical results and formal analyses have now accumulated to demonstrate conclusively that the tau-hypothesis is false. This article describes an alternative approach that is based on recent data showing that the information used in judging time-to-collision is task- and situation-dependent, is of many different origins (of which tau is just one) and is influenced by the information-processing constraints of the nervous system.