SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Kotwal RS, Scott LLF, Janak JC, Tarpey BW, Howard JT, Mazuchowski EL, Butler FK, Shackelford SA, Gurney JM, Stockinger ZT. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018; 85(1S Suppl 2): S112-S121.

Affiliation

Department of Defense Joint Trauma System, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas (Kotwal, Scott, Janak, Tarpey, Butler, Shackelford, Gurney, Stockinger); United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas (Howard, Gurney); Armed Forces Medical Examiner System, Dover Air Force Base, Delaware (Mazuchowski).

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/TA.0000000000001798

PMID

29334570

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reducing time from injury to care can optimize trauma patient outcomes. A previous study of prehospital transport of US military casualties during the Afghanistan conflict demonstrated the importance of time and treatment capability for combat casualty survival.

METHODS: A retrospective descriptive analysis was conducted to analyze battlefield data collected on US military combat casualties during the Iraq conflict from March 19, 2003 to August 31, 2010. All casualties were analyzed by mortality outcome (killed in action, died of wounds, case fatality rate) and compared to Afghanistan conflict. Detailed data for those who underwent prehospital transport were analyzed for effects of transport time, injury severity, and blood transfusion on survival.

RESULTS: For the total population, percent killed in action (16.6% vs 11.1%), percent died of wounds (5.9% vs 4.3%), and case fatality rate (10.0 vs 8.6) were higher for Iraq vs Afghanistan (P<0.001). Among 1,692 casualties (mean NISS, 22.5; mortality, 17.6%) with detailed data, the injury mechanism included 77.7% from explosions and 22.1% from gunshot wounds. For prehospital transport, 67.6% of casualties were transported within 60 minutes, and 32.4% of casualties were transported in greater than 60 minutes. Although 97.0% of deaths occurred in critical casualties (NISS 25-75), 52.7% of critical casualties survived. Critical casualties were transported more rapidly (P<0.01) and more frequently within 60 minutes (P<0.01) than other casualties. Critical casualties had lower mortality when blood was received (P<0.01). Among critical casualties, blood transfusion was associated with survival irrespective of transport time within or greater than 60 minutes (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: Although data were limited, early blood transfusion was associated with battlefield survival in Iraq as it was in Afghanistan. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Performance Improvement and Epidemiological, level IV.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print