Citation

Chouliara Z, Karatzias T, Gullone A, Ferguson S, Cosgrove K, Burke Draucker C. J. Interpers. Violence 2017; ePub(ePub): 886260517696860.

Affiliation

Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0886260517696860

PMID

29294731

Abstract

Our understanding of therapeutic change processes in group therapy for complex interpersonal trauma has been limited. The present study aimed at addressing this gap by developing a framework of therapeutic change in this field from a survivor and therapist perspective. This is a qualitative study, which utilized semistructured individual interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to identify recurrent themes. A final sample of n = 16 patients and n = 5 facilitators completed the interview. Main change processes identified by survivors were as follows: self versus others, trust versus threat, confrontation versus avoidance, and "patching up" versus true healing. Therapeutic processes identified by therapist facilitators included managing group dynamics, unpredictability and uncertainty, and process versus content. The proposed framework explains therapeutic change in group therapy in relational terms, that is, therapeutic dissonance, the dynamic interaction of self and experience as well as building empathic trusting relations. The importance of managing dissonance to aid personally meaningful recovery was highlighted. These findings have implications for the usefulness of relational and person-centered approaches to clinical practice in the area of interpersonal and complex trauma, especially in the early identification, prevention, and management of dropouts.

Language: en

Keywords

clinical framework; complex trauma; group therapy; qualitative; recovery