Citation

Haines A, Brown A, Javaid SF, Khan F, Noblett S, Omodunbi O, Sadiq K, Zaman W, Whittington R. Int. J. Offender Ther. Comp. Criminol. 2018; 62(12): 3965-3983.

Affiliation

Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0306624X17749449

PMID

29284378

Abstract

Violence risk assessment and management are key tasks in mental health services and should be guided by validated instruments covering both risk and protective factors. This article is part of an international effort to validate the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors (SAPROF) for violence. The SAPROF, Historical, Clinical, Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) and the Psychopathy Checklist-Screening Version (PCL-SV) were administered in a sample of 261 patients in U.K. forensic, general inpatient, and community mental health settings. There was significant variation between these groups on SAPROF scores with fewer protective factors in the forensic group. The prospective validity of the SAPROF for nonviolence in the general inpatient and community samples was moderate (area under the curve [AUC] =.60). Adoption of the SAPROF or similar instruments as a supplement to risk-focused assessments has the potential to improve awareness of protective factors and enhance therapeutic engagement in a range of mental health services.

Language: en

Keywords

mental health services; protective factors; risk assessment; risk violence; structured professional judgment