SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

de Jonge P, Wardenaar KJ, Lim CCW, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alonso J, Andrade LH, Bunting B, Chatterji S, Ciutan M, Gureje O, Karam EG, Lee S, Medina-Mora ME, Moskalewicz J, Navarro-Mateu F, Pennell BE, Piazza M, Posada-Villa J, Torres Y, Kessler RC, Scott K. Psychol. Med. 2018; 48(12): 2073-2084.

Affiliation

Department of Psychological Medicine,University of Otago,Dunedin, Otago,New Zealand.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Cambridge University Press)

DOI

10.1017/S0033291717003610

PMID

29254513

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The patterns of comorbidity among mental disorders have led researchers to model the underlying structure of psychopathology. While studies have suggested a structure including internalizing and externalizing disorders, less is known with regard to the cross-national stability of this model. Moreover, little data are available on the placement of eating disorders, bipolar disorder and psychotic experiences (PEs) in this structure.

METHODS: We evaluated the structure of mental disorders with data from the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview, including 15 lifetime mental disorders and six PEs. Respondents (n = 5478-15 499) were included from 10 high-, middle- and lower middle-income countries across the world aged 18 years or older. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were used to evaluate and compare the fit of different factor structures to the lifetime disorder data. Measurement invariance was evaluated with multigroup CFA (MG-CFA).

RESULTS: A second-order model with internalizing and externalizing factors and fear and distress subfactors best described the structure of common mental disorders. MG-CFA showed that this model was stable across countries. Of the uncommon disorders, bipolar disorder and eating disorder were best grouped with the internalizing factor, and PEs with a separate factor.

CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that cross-national patterns of lifetime common mental-disorder comorbidity can be explained with a second-order underlying structure that is stable across countries and can be extended to also cover less common mental disorders.


Language: en

Keywords

comorbidity; epidemiology; mental disorders; psychiatric disorders

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print