Citation

Kersten L, Vriends N, Steppan M, Raschle NM, Praetzlich M, Oldenhof H, Vermeiren R, Jansen L, Ackermann K, Bernhard A, Martinelli A, González-Madruga K, Puzzo I, Wells A, Rogers JC, Clanton R, Baker RH, Grisley L, Baumann S, Gundlach M, Kohls G, Gonzalez-Torres MA, Sesma-Pardo E, Dochnal R, Lazaratou H, Kalogerakis Z, Bigorra Gualba A, Smaragdi A, Siklósi R, Dikeos D, Hervás A, Fernández-Rivas A, De Brito SA, Konrad K, Herpertz-Dahlmann B, Fairchild G, Freitag CM, Popma A, Kieser M, Stadler C. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2017; 11: e219.

Affiliation

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Frontiers Research Foundation)

DOI

10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00219

PMID

29163090

PMCID

PMC5681536

Abstract

Exposure to community violence through witnessing or being directly victimized has been associated with conduct problems in a range of studies. However, the relationship between community violence exposure (CVE) and conduct problems has never been studied separately in healthy individuals and individuals with conduct disorder (CD). Therefore, it is not clear whether the association between CVE and conduct problems is due to confounding factors, because those with high conduct problems also tend to live in more violent neighborhoods, i.e., an ecological fallacy. Hence, the aim of the present study was: (1) to investigate whether the association between recent CVE and current conduct problems holds true for healthy controls as well as adolescents with a diagnosis of CD; (2) to examine whether the association is stable in both groups when including effects of aggression subtypes (proactive/reactive aggression), age, gender, site and socioeconomic status (SES); and (3) to test whether proactive or reactive aggression mediate the link between CVE and conduct problems. Data from 1178 children and adolescents (62% female; 44% CD) aged between 9 years and 18 years from seven European countries were analyzed. Conduct problems were assessed using the Kiddie-Schedule of Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia diagnostic interview. Information about CVE and aggression subtypes was obtained using self-report questionnaires (Social and Health Assessment and Reactive-Proactive aggression Questionnaire (RPQ), respectively). The association between witnessing community violence and conduct problems was significant in both groups (adolescents with CD and healthy controls). The association was also stable after examining the mediating effects of aggression subtypes while including moderating effects of age, gender and SES and controlling for effects of site in both groups. There were no clear differences between the groups in the strength of the association between witnessing violence and conduct problems. However, we found evidence for a ceiling effect, i.e., individuals with very high levels of conduct problems could not show a further increase if exposed to CVE and vice versa.

RESULTS indicate that there was no evidence for an ecological fallacy being the primary cause of the association, i.e., CVE must be considered a valid risk factor in the etiology of CD.

Language: en

Keywords

adolescence; antisocial behavior; community violence exposure; conduct disorder; proactive aggression; reactive aggression