Citation

Lewis BA, Eisert JL, Baldwin CL. Hum. Factors 2018; 60(2): 248-261.

Affiliation

George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0018720817742114

PMID

29131661

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to validate the importance of key acoustic criteria for use as in-vehicle forward collision warning (FCW) systems. Background Despite recent advances in vehicle safety, automobile crashes remain one of the leading causes of death. As automation allows for more control of noncritical functions by the vehicle, the potential for disengagement and distraction from the driving task also increases. It is, therefore, as important as ever that in-vehicle safety-critical interfaces are intuitive and unambiguous, promoting effective collision avoidance responses upon first exposure even under divided-attention conditions.

METHOD The current study used a driving simulator to assess the effectiveness of two warnings, one that met all essential acoustic parameters, one that met only some essential parameters, and a no-warning control in the context of a lead vehicle-following task in conjunction with a cognitive distractor task and collision event.

RESULTS Participants receiving an FCW comprising five essential acoustic components had improved collision avoidance responses relative to a no-warning condition and an FCW missing essential elements on their first exposure. Responses to a consistently good warning (GMU Prime) improved with subsequent exposures, whereas continued exposure to the less optimal FCW (GMU Sub-Prime) resulted in poorer performance even relative to receiving no warning at all.

CONCLUSIONS This study provides support for previous warning design studies and for the validity of five key acoustic parameters essential for the design of effective in-vehicle FCWs. Application Results from this study have implications for the design of auditory FCWs and in-vehicle display design.

Language: en

Keywords

acoustic parameters; auditory displays; auditory warnings; collision avoidance; forward collision warnings; in-vehicle warnings