SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Logan LM, Semrau JA, Debert CT, Kenzie JM, Scott SH, Dukelow SP. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018; 33(4): E61-E73.

Affiliation

Faculty of Kinesiology (Ms Logan and Dr Dukelow), Hotchkiss Brain Institute (Drs Semrau, Debert, and Dukelow and Mr Kenzie), and Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine (Drs Debert and Dukelow), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; and Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (Dr Scott).

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/HTR.0000000000000349

PMID

29084099

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of a robotic assessment tool to quantify sensorimotor, visuospatial attention, and executive function impairments in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). SETTING: Foothills Hospital (Calgary, Canada). PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three subjects with first-time TBI in the subacute to chronic phase participated in this study. Normative data were collected from 275 to 494 neurologically intact control subjects for each robotic task.

DESIGN: A prospective observational case series. Subjects with TBI completed brief clinical cognitive and motor assessments followed by robotic assessments of upper limb reaching, position sense, bimanual motor ability, attention, and visuospatial skills. Scores of subjects with TBI were compared with normative data. MAIN MEASURES: Robotic task performance was computed for each subject on each task, as well as performance on specific task parameters. Clinical assessments included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Fugl-Meyer upper extremity assessment, and Purdue Peg Board.

RESULTS: Subjects with TBI demonstrated a variety of deficits on robotic tasks. The proportion of TBI subjects who were significantly different from controls ranged from 36% (dominant arm reaching) to 60% (bimanual object hitting task).

CONCLUSION: Robotic measures allowed us to quantify a range of impairments specific to each subject, and offer an objective tool with which to examine these abilities after TBI.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print