Citation

Huang FH, Hwang SL, Yenn TC, Yu YC, Hsu CC, Huang HW. Safety Sci. 2006; 44(10): 935-946.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.ssci.2006.06.002

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

An automation function has been widely applied in main control room of nuclear power plants (NPPs). The alarm system of fourth nuclear power plant (FNPP) in Taiwan is also going to be developed with automatic technology that is expected to support the operators' performance and reduce the number of alarms. In this study, an experiment with a training simulator as an advanced alarm system was conducted to compare the effects of different alarm reset modes on performance and subjective ratings. The objective was to evaluate the practicability of alarm system with only auto-reset function in FNPP. Results revealed that, using the auto-reset mode, participants had lower task load index (TLX) on effort in the first test trial and was more satisfied under multi-task condition. In contrast, using manual reset mode, participants were more satisfied on alarm handling, monitoring, and decision making. In other words, both reset modes are necessary to assist the operator in different aspects, but with only single reset mode is insufficient. The reset function in advanced alarm system therefore should be very flexible.