SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Pedneault A, Beauregard E, Harris DA, Knight RA. J. Crim. Justice 2017; 50: 1-11.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2017, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.03.001

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

According to the rational choice approach, offenders consider costs and benefits when making decisions. This study applies this framework to sexual offenses and examines how various decisions made by perpetrators of sexual crimes influenced the desired and undesired crime outcomes that resulted. The study examines 2296 crimes of a sexual nature committed by a sample of 898 offenders evaluated at the Massachusetts Treatment Center. Using Generalized Estimating Equations, 23 predictor variables measuring sexually coercive decisions made in each crime about four aspects (who?, when?, where?, and how?) are used to predict ten desired (positive) and seven undesired (negative) crime outcomes for offenders.

RESULTS indicated that decisions made by offenders in the context of their sexual crimes were mostly oriented towards the production of immediate positive outcomes and the prevention of immediate negative outcomes, but demonstrated little consideration for non-immediate negative outcomes. Sexual offenders engage in myopic or hyperbolic discounting when making criminal decisions.


Language: en

Keywords

Crime benefits; Crime costs; Discounting; Myopia; Rational choice; Sex crimes

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print