Citation

Dawtry RJ, Callan MJ, Harvey AJ, Olson JM. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2018; 44(2): 186-199.

Affiliation

University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/0146167217733078

PMID

28972444

Abstract

Drawing on just-world theory and research into the suppression and justification of prejudice, we propose that the use of relative compared with absolute measures of an innocent victim's character enables observers to derogate the victim without transparently violating social norms or values proscribing derogation. In Study 1, we found that positive feelings expressed toward victims mirrored social norms proscribing negative reactions toward them. In Studies 2a, 2b, and 3, innocent victims were evaluated more negatively when ratings were made using relative (i.e., compared with evaluations of the average student or the self) versus absolute scales. In Study 4, this effect of scale type on derogation was stronger for people higher in the motivation to avoid prejudiced reactions to victims. Relative judgments seem to allow individuals to enact their counternormative motivation to derogate the victim under the cover of ambiguity and ostensibly rationally motivated social comparison processes.

Language: en

Keywords

prejudice; relative measures; social comparison; social norms; victim derogation